Dems favor environmental restrictions over border protection

Aubrey Hudson:
Border Patrol agents must abandon their vehicles to chase illegal immigrants, drug smugglers and potential terrorists who illegally cross into the United States and onto federal lands that are designated as environmentally sensitive areas.
Legislation passed by the House last week to slash environmental red tape would allow law enforcement to “do the job they are paid to do,” said Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah), who authored the language.
The measure was part of a package of conservation and jobs legislation that passed the House 232 to 188 on a mostly party-line vote.
“When it comes to the Environmental Protection Agency, the American public is well aware of the ability of this federal agency to slow our economy with debilitating regulations,” said Rep. Doc Hastings (R-Wash.), chairman of the House Resources Committee. “When it comes to our federal lands, which are predominately located in Western states, there is plenty of bureaucracy and red tape to go around.
“It doesn’t have to take federal spending or taxpayer money to solve these problems. It simply takes Congress making common sense changes in laws and regulations to restore reasonableness, transparency, accountability and sometimes sanity, to the actions of the federal government,” Hastings said.
Democrats suggested that Republicans were more interested in rounding up illegal border crossers than they are in protecting the environment. “The border is the excuse, the target is the environment,” said Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.).
Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) called the measure a “dangerous overreach.” “Environmental laws are not the problem when it comes to guarding the border,” Markey said.
Bishop’s language gives the Homeland Security Department authority to waive more than a half-dozen environmental laws on 20 million acres of federal land along the southern and northern borders.
Numerous federal classifications including wilderness areas and habitats for endangered species act as an environmental gate, prohibiting the use of motorized vehicles to patrol or apprehend criminals except in emergency situations. As a result, Bishop says, the property becomes a highway for criminals to avoid detection and a sanctuary to commit violent crimes including the rape of female illegal immigrants who are smuggled across the border. “Rape trees” mark these crimes where the underwear of victims is hung on the branches as a trophy.
... 
Democrats are not really protecting the environment since their policy makes it easier for illegals to defile it.  They just see illegals as future Democrat voters and they do not want to take any effective action to stop them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more